Comments By Matt H.

https://photos.truckingtruth.com/thumbs/69995/thumb-1498956518.0097.jpg avatar
  • Matt H.
  • Joined:
  • 7 years, 1 month ago
  • Comments:
  • 28

Page 2 of 3

Go To Page:    
Previous Page Next Page

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Help Choosing a Training Program: Roehl or Prime?

1). I drive for Roehl. I went through their gycdl program in Conley, GA. 3 weeks of school, then 19 days with an OTR trainer. I've been solo for 6 months December 5th. I've done about 53,000 miles so far.

2) I was considering Prime also. I only applied to Roehl. If I remember correctly Prime has you drive 40,000 miles with a trainer? Roehl's hometime options are convenient. 10/2, 11/3, 18/4, ?.....31/7. I've done various combinations with no issues I simply tell my FM when I'd like to be home next and where. I do my hometime in ME or RI. Prime is obviously a solid company. You'd be fine either way. I've never driven a truck for another company.

3). All my instructors/trainer were professionals. My instructors in Conley (I essentially had 3 which isn't typical. There was a gap in classes so it freed up instructors) were each different. For example one was helpful with regard to shifting at lows rpms for fuel economy another wasn't as concerned about keeping rpms down but was very instructive about tight cornering. The third (head instructor) was very laid back but didn't miss ANYTHING. He would get you talking and let you relax a bit and mellow things out. They all expect to see progress and they all approach teaching from different angles. They want you to succeed. My OTR trainer was great. I wouldn't opt to share a truck any longer then I have to personally, but my trainer refined everything I learned in school while teaching the way the work actually gets done. He really helped with very precise backing moves. He followed the program and made sure I had experience with all common events I would run into on the road.

4). My OTR trainer was northeast regional so he parked every weekend. I spent Saturday and Sunday at home throughout OTR training. It took longer to achieve 19 days but it wasn't a big deal to me. After finishing my 19 days of OTR training I traveled back to GA. I did a "check ride" with an instructor and ran through the backing course. Then I was issued a truck. I was dispatched the following morning and did 11/3 my first shift.

5) Start anytime you want. These companies are adept at what they do. The hiring process is no different.

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Mexico, Alaska, Canada

I drive for Roehl. I've hauled loads through Canada a few times from Maine through Canada into Michigan. On two other occasions I was sent into Canada empty to haul loads back into the USA. We get $25 crossing the border, so $50 for in/out of Canada. Driving through (in transit) isn't much paperwork. Picking up in Canada and delivering in the USA is significantly more paperwork and involves phone calls and emails or faxes. I actually just ordered a printer/scanner for my truck to streamline that process. That's my experience with Canada thus far.

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Overnight parking at rest areas.

A lot of rest areas are posted "no overnight parking"

Does this apply to trucks?? Just campers and cars?? What's the deal?

http://www.interstaterestareas.com/overnight-parking-rules/

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Roehl OTR doesn't travel all 48 states?

double-quotes-start.png

I'd share the map I have if I could figure out how. I've been solo for Roehl for almost 6 months. I'm from RI, my classmate was from TX. We both ended up mostly running Midwest. I've crossed the Mississippi three times and not by much. Lots of PA. Through IN past Chicago up into WI. Through Canada a few times from ME to MI.

double-quotes-end.png

Hey, Matt H! I'm also from RI and plan to drive for Roehl upon graduating from NETTTS. One more week of school and then the road test whenever RI DMV works through their back log (apparently, there's a 1-2 month delay). If you're amenable and if possible, I would like to speak with you off line about your job. Thanks!

Of course. I'd be happy to. Email me your number? I'll be parked pretty early tomorrow I could call you then? If you prefer text/email just let me know.

mhowarth3@gmail.com

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Roehl OTR doesn't travel all 48 states?

I'd share the map I have if I could figure out how. I've been solo for Roehl for almost 6 months. I'm from RI, my classmate was from TX. We both ended up mostly running Midwest. I've crossed the Mississippi three times and not by much. Lots of PA. Through IN past Chicago up into WI. Through Canada a few times from ME to MI.

Posted:  6 years, 5 months ago

View Topic:

Roehl ?

Yes. I went through their "get your CDL" program. All of the training for that program is done on 10 speed manual transmissions.

Posted:  6 years, 6 months ago

View Topic:

Ex-Driver with no verifiable in the last 10 years

A gentleman in my class at Roehl was in the same situation. Driving since 1982 but nothing in the last 5 years. He did the "get your CDL program" at Roehl. Though he didn't actually have to test out with the state. After that he did the full 19 days OTR with a trainer. That trainer lucked out. 👍

Posted:  6 years, 7 months ago

View Topic:

Hard Lesson Learned

Susan wrote:

double-quotes-start.png

My company marks the side of the trailers, in feet, so we can easily tell how many feet the center of the 5th axle is from the kingpin. Much easier to know you're compliant with bridge laws.

I'm glad to see it explained.

double-quotes-end.png

Bridge law? I think you meant kingpin law.

The federal bridge law formula (for example) for 80,000 pounds gross weight is 51' from the rear most axle of the tandems to the front steer axle of the tractor is the minimum legal distance for a 5 axle trailer. As the weight is less, the minimum allowable distance decreases. Relatively speaking; for a 53' trailer and a condo-sleeper, the one hole (tandems set all the way to the front of the rails, closest to the cab) is about at the 54'-55' mark. All but impossible to be non-compliant with bridge law for a 53' tractor and trailer combination. However in the one hole, many northeast states will cite for excessive overhang. You can be in compliance with bridge laws and be non-compliant with kingpin setting law.

Where bridge law becomes more critical and enforced is with highly dense, heavy loads in a short trailer, such as 45,000 pounds of gravel in a 30' dump. Typically this type of trailer is a tri-axle configuration because bridge law goes by max weight per axle and distance between each axle and/or a set of axles. It's complicated.

Bridge law was far more relevant when there was greater restriction in overall legal length, 1980s during the COE (cab over) era when 40' and 45' trailers were SOP, and 80,000 pounds gross combination weight was legal.

In addition not all companies mark their trailers like you mentioned, because kingpin law varies from state to state. Walmart does not mark 41' on center, but they do mark maximum hole settings by state that's relevant to kingpin setting law (not bridge law) on the side of each trailer above the tandem area. The maximum hole setting is furtherest from the kingpin to the rear of the trailer.

To be specific; in PA and NJ (where I spend the majority of my time) I can work with the 6-11 holes (I'll push to 12 if need-be) to comply with kingpin law, and get the load legal on the tandems and drives.

Each state's kingpin law is different and some states like Maryland, New Jersey and Connecticut are very strict, known to use a tape measure for overhang infractions. This is why I originally posed the question to Unholychaos: "what states are you routed through?"

In my profile photo gallery I have two images relevant to state kingpin law. With a laptop it shoukd be readable, probably not with a phone though. For you Swifties, this information is in the drivers handbook and quick notes binder.

Can you elaborate on the overhang? Specifically with regard to 53' van trailers. I'm aware of the bridge laws (with regard to axle weights) and king pin laws (I'm under the impression that restricting the distance from king pin to rear axle is in attempt to control and manage the turning radius of trucks)

I haven't found any consistent information about why I shouldn't/can't run with the tandems all the way forward? If the weight permits I usually have them as far forward as possible. Is that also a problem in some states??

Posted:  6 years, 8 months ago

View Topic:

Overhang and "did I do that?".

Actually. Come to think of it. If you've got room in a big parking lot, park right against a painted line, turn hard in the opposite direction, hold the turn for a bit then stop, get out and see where your rear bumper is. Try it a few times. Should give you an idea how close something can be beside you without it being a problem. 👍

Posted:  6 years, 8 months ago

View Topic:

Overhang and "did I do that?".

I think you're talking about the amount of overhang behind your rear axle? I don't have any great advice. We've all seen videos of truck's dragging cars on their ICC bumper.

Page 2 of 3

Go To Page:    
Previous Page Next Page

Why Join Trucking Truth?

We have an awesome set of tools that will help you understand the trucking industry and prepare for a great start to your trucking career. Not only that, but everything we offer here at TruckingTruth is 100% free - no strings attached! Sign up now and get instant access to our member's section:
High Road Training Program Logo
  • The High Road Training Program
  • The High Road Article Series
  • The Friendliest Trucker's Forum Ever!
  • Email Updates When New Articles Are Posted

Apply For Paid CDL Training Through TruckingTruth

Did you know you can fill out one quick form here on TruckingTruth and apply to several companies at once for paid CDL training? Seriously! The application only takes one minute. You will speak with recruiters today. There is no obligation whatsoever. Learn more and apply here:

Apply For Paid CDL Training